Just One Click to Share
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
The Negative Calorie Diet has become and extremely popular diet solution, but has also become the object of many debates. While the diet is appealing to many, the actual benefits of the diet are often questioned. The negative calorie diet works on the idea that the body has to burn energy in order to digest some foods. Thus, the body will actually burn fat. For example, an orange, which contains 50 calories, would take a particular amount of energy for the body to process all of the nutrients and vitamins in the orange. So, the person would be burning more than the 50 calories contained within the orange. However, the speed of metabolism has a major impact on how many calories will be burned.
The Negative Calorie Diet states that by consuming “negative calorie foods,” the body is will be left with a negative calorie deduction. Thus, for every orange a person eats, a person should burn off 25 of the 50 calories. Advocates of the Negative Calorie Diet encourage dieters to eat frequent, healthy meals, which increases the speed of a person’s metabolism. There are many other examples of negative calorie foods, which include asparagus, broccoli, cabbage, grapefruit, apples, lettuce, and strawberries. All of the negative calorie foods should be eaten in their natural state, because cooking them, and doing other things to them can change their caloric makeup. The Negative Calorie Diet plan is restricted to fruits and vegetables, which may be hard for many dieters to follow.
Many critics have questioned the effectiveness of the Negative Calorie Diet. The many critics of the Negative Calorie Diet often argue that there are no foods that contain “negative” calories, and that a person cannot eat their way to weight loss. It has also been argued that following the diet can offset the positive calorie energy reserves. Critics believe that if the energy reserves are activated, the effectiveness of weight training will be cancelled. The opposition also argues that the human body needs calories to create energy for exercise and for recovering from exercise. The Negative Calorie Diet advocates agree that there are no foods that contain negative calories. However, the advocates believe that by ingesting certain foods a person can increase their metabolic processes, which results in weight loss.
The debate over the Negative Calorie Diet exists because there is no scientific proof to confirm the diet’s effectiveness. There is also little information surrounding the Negative Calorie Diet, which makes the debate even greater. The diet is also seen as being more theoretical than practical, which poses a problem for many potential dieters. The advocates of the diet plan believe that the diet will work, and believe the diet offers many benefits. First, advocates say that the Negative Calorie Diet requires little effort with great benefits. The diet is also said to promote consumption of foods that are rich in vitamins and minerals. Finally, a Negative Calorie diet can increase the body’s metabolism.
There are many pros and cons to the Negative Calorie diet. The diet’s advocates often promote the pros. The most important “pro” of the Negative Calorie diet is that it encourages individuals to consume more fresh fruits, vegetables, and water. Incorporating the “negative calorie” foods into a daily diet can promote better health. The “negative calorie” foods contain vitamins, minerals, enzymes, and other nutrients that are crucial to the optimum functioning of the body. Many of the fruits used in the Negative Calorie Diet contain high levels of antioxidants. The critics of the Negative Calorie Diet promote the cons of the diet. The science behind the diet is not known, and some believe that it is non-existent. The theory of the Negative Calorie Diet has not been studied under controlled conditions. The diet also limits individuals to fruits and vegetables, which does not promote variety in their diet, leading to health problems.